Explore by your role
Bring independent stakeholder evidence and outside challenge to a decision before it goes to the board, so it can withstand scrutiny after the fact, not just agreement in the room.
This guide explains how to run pre-decision stakeholder research before a major strategic, capital, or reputational commitment. After reading, you will know what to test, whom to speak to, how to sequence the work, and how to feed findings into the actual decision.
This guide sets out how boards in financial services can raise the quality of their most consequential decisions, from paper design to dissent management. After reading, you will know what to change in your board process, what to demand from executives, and where good boards consistently outperform mediocre ones.
This guide explains how to identify, test, and govern the assumptions embedded in strategic plans, the source of most strategic failure in financial services. After reading, you will know how to surface hidden assumptions, rank them by fragility, and build the monitoring discipline that keeps a plan honest as conditions change.
This guide explains what senior stakeholders (investors, regulators, customers, employees, partners) are typically thinking and weighing in the run-up to a major corporate decision, and how to surface those views before you commit. After reading, you will know how to read the room accurately, test your assumptions, and avoid the predictable failures of imagined consensus.
This guide sets out how FCA regulated firms should identify, assess, and act on stakeholder risks in a way that meets Consumer Duty, SM&CR, and operational resilience expectations. After reading, senior leaders will know how to build a stakeholder risk process that stands up to board scrutiny and regulatory challenge.
This guide sets out the specific blind spots that distort major decisions at the top of financial services firms, and how senior leaders can surface them before they cause damage. After reading, you will have a practical method for pressure-testing your own reasoning and your team's before capital, reputation, or regulatory standing is committed.
Where internal confidence may exceed external evidence
Where a specific question needs an outside answer, quickly
Where internal consensus may be mistaken for validation
Where the operating environment may be moving faster than internal reporting reflects