Explore by your role
Will this decision hold up when someone asks you to defend it?
Bring independent stakeholder evidence and outside challenge to a decision before it goes to the board, so it can withstand scrutiny after the fact, not just agreement in the room.
What this looks like
Examples of who brings us in
- A CEO or executive team taking a significant decision to the board, wanting an independent view of the stakeholders and risks before the paper is finalised.
- A general manager accountable for a decision that spans multiple functions, needing a single, evidence-based picture rather than competing internal views.
- An executive team wanting to know whether internal agreement reflects genuine consensus or unexamined groupthink.
Relevant guides
What Procurement, Risk and Compliance Need Before Approving a New Supplier
A practical guide to the evidence, judgements and sequencing required before onboarding a new third party in a regulated firm. After reading, you will know what to demand from the business sponsor, what each control function must verify, and where approvals typically fail.
How to Run Go-to-Market Research in Financial Services
A practical guide to designing go-to-market research for financial services products and propositions, covering buyer evidence, regulatory realities, and competitive signal. After reading, you will be able to scope, sequence, and pressure-test a GTM research programme that holds up with your board, your distribution partners, and the first line.
How to Build Stakeholder Intelligence Before a Board Decision
A practical guide to gathering, structuring, and presenting stakeholder intelligence before a material board decision in a regulated firm. After reading, you will know what to collect, how to test it, and how to deliver it in a form that sharpens board judgement rather than crowding it.
How to Structure an Internal Audit Opinion That Drives Board Action
This guide shows senior leaders how to craft an Internal Audit opinion on risk management effectiveness that compels decision-making rather than inviting line-by-line pushback from executives. You will finish with a clearer method for structuring the opinion, sequencing stakeholder engagement, and framing findings so the board acts.
How to Structure a Recovery Plan Regulators Will Accept as Executable
A practical guide to building a Recovery Plan that supervisors treat as a credible operational document rather than a compliance artefact. Readers will learn how to sequence stress calibration, option design, governance triggers, and management actions so the plan holds up under both desktop review and live stress.
How to Write an ICAAP Narrative That Shows Real Capital Judgement
This guide sets out how to construct an ICAAP document that evidences genuine board-level thinking about capital adequacy, not formulaic compliance. After reading, you will know how to sequence the narrative, where to place judgement, and how to make the document defensible under supervisory challenge.
Relevant capabilities
Stakeholder Proximity
Where internal confidence may exceed external evidence
Expert Network
Where a specific question needs an outside answer, quickly
Decision Rooms
Where internal consensus may be mistaken for validation
Signal Briefings
Where the operating environment may be moving faster than internal reporting reflects