Topic hub
Governance and Decision Defensibility
Boards and executive teams are increasingly expected to show their working, not just their conclusions. When a decision is challenged after the fact, what matters is whether the reasoning, evidence and dissent were properly recorded and tested at the time, not simply whether the outcome was reasonable.
Polar Insight's view
Polar Insight helps leadership teams build decisions that can withstand scrutiny before it happens, by testing evidence quality, capturing genuine challenge, and creating a rationale that holds up under review.
Featured insights
RTGS delay: why the CHAPS standards slip is a governance problem, not a technical one
The Bank of England has deferred the November 2026 RTGS standards release in its entirety after Swift postponed its own CBPR+ release, citing industry concerns about readiness for the removal of unstructured postal addresses. For boards that had budgeted, staffed and sequenced ISO 20022 migration around a fixed November date, the reset is a live test of change governance and vendor accountability.
Dolfin visa scheme: what the £35.5m ban says about SMCR integrity tests
The FCA has fined and banned former Dolfin executives over a scheme that helped at least 99 clients bypass investor visa rules, generating £35.5m in fees. The case resets expectations on shadow control, concealment, and senior manager integrity for boards across wealth and private banking.
SVS ban: FCA sends pension custody warning to fund manager boards
The FCA has fined and banned Demetrios Hadjigeorgiou, former CEO of SVS Securities, for failing to manage the firm and protect customers whose pension savings were placed in high-risk products. For senior leaders in asset and wealth management, the case sharpens personal accountability where retail money, product incentives, and pricing decisions intersect.
Debt management ban shows FCA tightening the honesty net
The FCA has banned Howard Roland Duckett, a former senior manager at debt management firm Beauforce Corporation, citing a serious lack of honesty and integrity following a High Court director disqualification he failed to disclose. Combined with the recent Blue Horizon prohibitions, the action signals a sharper regulatory posture on individual accountability that senior leaders and boards must factor into governance and disclosure practices.
Blue Horizon bans: the FCA draws a hard line on integrity at the top
The FCA has fined and banned two former Blue Horizon Asset Management executives for falsifying documents during attempted acquisitions of a UK bank and Reading Football Club. The case sets a clear marker on senior manager conduct and the evidentiary weight regulators place on acquisition submissions.
Dunne and Fenech: the Tribunal recalibrates FCA penalties, not principles
The Upper Tribunal upheld the FCA's bans on two individuals central to a £126m defined benefit pension transfer scandal, but cut their fines after finding only 18% of advice was unsuitable, not all of it. For senior leaders, the ruling clarifies how enforcement outcomes will be tested on evidence, and reinforces that dishonesty toward the regulator remains a career-ending line.
Relevant guides
How to Conduct a Governance Review After a Regulatory Enforcement Action
This guide sets out how to run a credible, board-led governance review in the wake of a regulatory enforcement action. After reading, you will know how to scope the review, sequence findings, engage the regulator, and convert lessons into durable governance change.
How to Surface Leadership Blind Spots in Major Decisions
A practical guide for senior executives and boards on identifying and countering the blind spots that distort major decisions in financial services. Readers will finish with a workable method for pressure-testing conviction before capital, reputation, or regulatory standing is committed.
How to Make a Defensible Board Decision
A practical guide for board members and executives on how to make decisions that hold up under regulatory, shareholder, and litigation scrutiny. After reading, you will know how to structure the process, evidence, and record so the decision itself, not just the outcome, can be defended.
Why Enterprise Buyers Choose to Do Nothing Instead of Changing Provider
This guide explains the real reasons enterprise buyers in financial services default to inaction when faced with a provider switch, and how to diagnose whether 'do nothing' is a considered choice or a governance failure. After reading, you will be able to identify the specific frictions driving inertia and design a decision process that produces a defensible outcome either way.
How to Build a Credible Operational Resilience Self-Assessment
This guide sets out how to produce an operational resilience self-assessment that stands up to board challenge and supervisory review. After reading it, senior leaders will know how to structure the document, where the evidence typically falls short, and how to demonstrate genuine capability rather than paper compliance.
How to Construct a Defensible ICAAP Narrative Aligned to Board Risk Appetite
This guide sets out how to build an ICAAP narrative that connects capital assessment to board-owned risk appetite in a way supervisors find credible. After reading, you will know how to structure the story, where the weak points usually sit, and what evidence to marshal before submission.