Rathi's tokenisation push: from experiment to adoption in wholesale markets
FCA chief executive Nikhil Rathi has told the City that the UK must move from experimentation to adoption on tokenisation and AI, citing estimates of £33 billion in annual GDP benefit. For senior leaders in wholesale markets, the signal is that regulatory patience with pilots is running out and hybrid infrastructure decisions can no longer be deferred.
Nikhil Rathi used a TheCityUK dinner on 22 September to draw a line under the pilot era. The FCA chief executive told an audience at the former Midland Bank HQ that the UK must move from experimentation to adoption, creating the conditions for tokenisation and other emerging technologies to scale safely in wholesale markets (FCA). The backdrop: HSBC Orion has just become the first entrant approved to provide live Digital Securities Depository services (FCA).
Key Executive Takeaways
- The FCA is signalling that tokenisation and on-chain infrastructure should now move from proof-of-concept to production in UK wholesale markets, with the first live Digital Securities Depository already approved.
- Rathi cited estimates of around £33 billion in potential annual UK GDP benefit and £14 billion in tax revenues from these technologies, framing adoption as a competitiveness issue rather than an innovation experiment.
- Firms should expect a hybrid market structure combining traditional and on-chain rails, which raises immediate board-level questions on interoperability, operational resilience, and where to commit capital.
The competitive framing has shifted
Rathi's speech marks a change in tone. Where previous FCA interventions positioned digital assets as a regulatory problem to be contained, this one positions them as a growth lever the UK cannot afford to miss. He cited estimates of around £33 billion in potential annual UK GDP benefit and £14 billion in tax revenues (FCA), and noted that the European Central Bank launched wholesale digital payments in the same week (FCA). The subtext for boards: London's second-place global standing is not guaranteed, and the regulator is prepared to move ahead of legislation to protect it.
Hybrid infrastructure is now the working assumption
The most consequential line for architecture decisions is Rathi's statement that the future market ecosystem is likely to combine traditional and on-chain infrastructure, raising questions about interoperability, market structure and regulatory oversight (FCA). That effectively rules out a clean cutover and rules in a decade of parallel-running complexity. For CFOs and COOs at banks and asset managers, this means budget lines for legacy settlement, custody, and reconciliation cannot be run down on the assumption of imminent replacement. It also means the interoperability layer, not the ledger itself, is where competitive advantage and operational risk will concentrate.
The regulatory posture is agile, not settled
Rathi called for regulation that is agile and reform-minded, enabling innovation while maintaining market integrity, resilience and investor protection (FCA). For general counsel and compliance leaders, agile regulation is a double-edged instrument: it lowers barriers to entry but raises the cost of misreading supervisory expectations. Firms that treated the crypto and digital securities regimes as adjacent to core business now need to fold them into enterprise risk frameworks, because the FCA is explicitly saying it will go as far as it can even where legislation lags (FCA).
The AI overlay
Rathi also placed AI at the centre of the same speech, noting that the pace of development of frontier AI is raising foundational questions about technology infrastructure, cyber and operational resilience (FCA). Read together with the tokenisation message, this is a supervisor telling wholesale firms that two structural shifts are arriving simultaneously and that operational resilience frameworks designed for a slower, single-technology transition will not hold.
The implication is straightforward. Senior leaders who have been waiting for legislative clarity before committing to tokenised infrastructure now have a public signal that waiting is itself a strategic choice, and not a neutral one.
What this reveals
Rathi's shift from 'contain the risk' to 'adopt at scale' exposes a common leadership assumption in wholesale markets: that regulatory patience with pilots would persist until firms felt commercially ready. That assumption has quietly expired, and boards who have treated tokenisation as an innovation-team experiment now face a competitiveness framing they have not built strategy or capital plans around. The deeper issue is that regulatory posture on emerging infrastructure can move faster than internal strategy cycles, leaving executive teams with a stale read of what supervisors expect them to be doing, not just permitted to do.
Questions accountable leaders should ask
- 01When did your board last revisit its working assumption about the pace at which the FCA expects tokenisation and on-chain infrastructure to move from pilot to production?
- 02Can your CFO and COO articulate a capital plan that assumes a decade of parallel-running traditional and on-chain rails, rather than a clean cutover or indefinite deferral?
- 03Where in your architecture and operating model is interoperability treated as a first-class design question, and who owns it at executive committee level?
- 04How would you know if your innovation team's read of regulator appetite has diverged from what supervisors are actually signalling to peer firms and market infrastructure providers?
- 05If a supervisor asked tomorrow why your firm has not moved beyond proof-of-concept, would your answer reflect a deliberate strategic choice or a deferred decision?
What accountable leaders should do now
- 1Commission a short, board-level restatement of the firm's working assumptions on tokenisation adoption pace, and test them against the FCA's most recent public and private signals rather than last year's internal view.
- 2Ask the CFO and COO to model a hybrid infrastructure scenario explicitly, with interoperability, custody and reconciliation costs run in parallel for a defined period, and identify where capital allocation decisions can no longer be deferred.
- 3Assign clear executive ownership for the interoperability layer between traditional and on-chain rails, and require a first read on operational resilience and third-party risk implications within one board cycle.
- 4Pressure-test the firm's competitive position against the framing Rathi has now put on the table: if adoption is a competitiveness issue, where does the firm stand relative to peers who are already live or in supervised deployment?
- 5Update the board's forward agenda so tokenisation and hybrid infrastructure are treated as a standing strategic item, not an innovation update, with a defined decision point on commitment rather than continued observation.
Explore the practical guide
A practical guide for senior financial services leaders on stress-testing the assumptions underneath a strategic decision before capital, reputation, or regulatory standing is on the line. Readers will finish with a working method for surfacing hidden beliefs, designing cheap tests, and knowing when the evidence is strong enough to commit.
Read the guideWhere the operating environment may be moving faster than internal reporting reflects
Polar Insight's Signal Briefings translate emerging regulatory, stakeholder, and market developments into a clear implication for accountable leaders.
Explore Signal BriefingsRelated insights
London FX hits record $4.6 trillion daily: what the surge means for wholesale strategy
The Bank of England's April 2026 turnover survey shows UK foreign exchange activity at a record $4,609 billion per day, up 20% in six months and 14% year on year. For bank treasurers, asset managers and market infrastructure providers, the numbers reset assumptions about London's post-Brexit standing and the operational demands of a swaps-heavy market.
238,000 suspected money mule accounts: why account closures are not the win banks think
The FCA's latest survey shows firms closed 238,396 suspected mule accounts in 2025, but criminals are still cashing out between the second and fifth account in the chain. For senior leaders, the data reframes mule controls as an intelligence-sharing problem, not a volume metric.
Protection's coverage gap: the FCA's quiet test of Consumer Duty
The FCA's final Pure Protection Market Study finds competition works for existing customers but around 58% of adults hold no protection cover. Rather than impose new rules, the regulator is testing whether firms can close the gap under Consumer Duty and product governance obligations already on the books.
Stakeholder Signals
Consequential developments in financial services and other regulated markets, with one implication for accountable leaders.
