How to Prepare for an FCA Supervisory Visit
A practical guide to preparing for an FCA supervisory visit, from interpreting the scoping letter to managing the day itself and the follow-up. After reading, you will know what good preparation looks like, where firms typically slip, and how to position your firm to come out of the visit stronger.
How to prepare for an FCA supervisory visit
An FCA supervisory visit is not an audit. It is a judgement-forming exercise. Supervisors are testing whether what your firm says about itself matches what they see, hear, and read on the day. Preparation is about closing that gap before they arrive, not rehearsing answers.
Here is how to prepare properly, in the order that matters.
Decode the scoping letter precisely
The scoping letter tells you more than the agenda. Read it for three things: the supervisory theme it sits under (operational resilience, Consumer Duty, financial crime, governance), the specific products or customer segments named, and the documents requested. The combination signals the hypothesis the FCA is testing.
If the letter asks for board minutes covering a specific period alongside complaints MI, they are likely probing whether the board saw, understood, and acted on a known issue. If they want product governance papers plus a sample of customer files, they are testing outcomes against your stated target market. Name the hypothesis internally. Prepare against it.
Run a pre-read of your own materials
Whatever you send in, read it as a supervisor would. The most common failure is sending polished decks that contradict the underlying MI, or board minutes that record decisions without the challenge that preceded them.
Look for: gaps between policy and practice, metrics that have drifted without commentary, risks logged amber for more than two quarters with no movement, and customer outcomes data that has not been triangulated against complaints, vulnerability flags, or persistency. If you can see the inconsistency, so will they.
Fix what you can. For what you cannot fix in time, prepare a clear, unvarnished explanation of why, what you are doing about it, and by when.
Prepare the people, not the script
Supervisors interview executives, NEDs, and second and third line heads. They are listening for ownership, specificity, and consistency. Coaching people to stay on message backfires. Coaching them to know their numbers, own their weaknesses, and speak plainly does not.
For each interviewee, run a focused session covering: the three things they are accountable for, the current MI, the known issues and what they are doing, and the questions they would least like to be asked. The Chair and SMF holders should be able to describe the firm's risks in their own words, not the CRO's.
Where a NED is interviewed, make sure they have seen recent papers, not just historic ones. Supervisors test whether non-executives are actually engaged.
Stress-test the consistency of your story
This is where most firms get caught. The CEO describes the strategy one way, the COO another, and the MI tells a third story. Before the visit, sit the senior team in a room and ask each to answer the same five questions: What are our top three risks? What is the most uncomfortable thing in our customer outcomes data? Where is the control environment weakest? What has the board challenged in the last six months? What have we changed as a result?
If the answers diverge, you have work to do before the FCA arrives, not after.
Manage the day itself
Appoint a single coordinator who manages logistics, document requests on the day, and the running order. Set up a quiet room for the FCA team and a separate working room for your own. Brief everyone that follow-up requests should go through the coordinator, not direct to individuals.
If a question cannot be answered accurately on the spot, say so and commit to a timeframe. Speculation is the single biggest source of post-visit problems.
Handle the follow-up with discipline
The visit ends when the closing letter lands, not when the supervisors leave. Debrief the same day: what did they probe hardest, what surprised them, what surprised you. Capture this while it is fresh.
When the feedback letter arrives, respond with a plan that is specific, dated, and owned at SMF level. Vague commitments invite repeat visits.
The decision to make now
Before your next supervisory contact, ask yourself one question: if the FCA walked in tomorrow on the theme you are most exposed to, would the story your executives tell match the story your MI tells? If you cannot answer yes with confidence, that is where preparation starts.
Related guides
How to Build a Credible Section 166 Skilled Person Review Response Plan
This guide sets out how to construct a response plan for a Section 166 review that stands up to regulatory scrutiny and protects the firm's standing. After reading it, you will know how to sequence the response, manage the skilled person relationship, and avoid the errors that turn a manageable review into a supervisory crisis.
How to Build a Credible Wind-Down Plan for PRA and FCA Expectations
This guide sets out how to construct a wind-down plan that withstands supervisory scrutiny under the PRA's resolvability regime and the FCA's WDPG expectations. After reading, you will know where credibility is won or lost, which assumptions attract challenge, and how to sequence the work so the plan is genuinely executable.
What Regulators Look For in a Submission: A Practical Guide
A direct guide to what supervisors actually assess when reviewing a regulatory submission, from authorisations to skilled person responses. After reading, you will know how to structure, evidence, and pitch a submission so it survives scrutiny the first time.
What Makes a Decision Defensible to Regulators: A Practical Guide
This guide explains what regulators actually look for when they test a major decision after the fact, and how to build defensibility into the decision itself rather than reconstruct it later. You will finish with a clear view of what to document, who to involve, and where most firms leave themselves exposed.
How to Prepare a Regulatory Filing With Stakeholder Risk Assessment
A practical guide to embedding stakeholder risk assessment into a regulatory filing so it reads as credible, evidenced, and decision-ready. After reading, you will know how to sequence the work, what supervisors actually look for, and where filings typically fall apart.
Where internal confidence may exceed external evidence
Polar Insight helps leadership teams test critical assumptions against stakeholder, market, regulatory, and operational reality before risk compounds.
Explore Stakeholder Proximity