The Decision Defensibility Check
Could this decision withstand challenge?
Use these questions to identify where confidence may be stronger than the evidence supporting it.
- 01
Evidence quality
What evidence, beyond internal reporting, supports the confidence behind this decision?
- 02
Stakeholder proximity
When did you last hear directly from the stakeholders most affected, rather than through an intermediary?
- 03
Assumption expiry
Which of the assumptions this decision relies on have not been retested since it was approved?
- 04
External validation
Has anyone outside the team that built this case been asked to challenge it?
- 05
Challenge and dissent
Was genuine dissent raised and recorded, or did the group converge too quickly?
- 06
Ownership
If this decision is challenged in twelve months, who is accountable for defending it?
- 07
Audit trail
Could you reconstruct, from the record alone, why this decision was made?
- 08
Consequences of error
What would it cost, financially, regulatorily or reputationally, if the central assumption turned out to be wrong?
Guides that help you test this
How to Test Strategic Assumptions Before Committing Capital or Reputation
This guide sets out how senior leaders in financial services can stress-test the assumptions underpinning a strategic decision before capital, reputation or regulatory standing is committed. After reading, you will know which assumptions matter most, how to test them without tipping your hand, and how to distinguish genuine validation from confirmation dressed up as evidence.
How to Validate Stakeholder Consensus Before Major Strategic Decisions
This guide sets out a practical method for testing whether apparent stakeholder agreement is real before you commit to a major strategic move. After reading it, you will know how to separate genuine consensus from polite acquiescence, and where to probe hardest before the point of no return.
Separating Genuine Concerns from Change Resistance in Strategy Implementation
This guide sets out how to test whether stakeholder pushback on an approved strategy reflects substantive risk or predictable resistance to change. After reading, you will have a practical method for distinguishing the two and deciding what to act on before implementation stalls.
Reducing Uncertainty Before You Commit to a Major Strategic Move
This guide explains how structured external stakeholder intelligence reduces the specific uncertainties that make large strategic decisions hard to sign off. After reading, you will know where to apply it, what questions it should answer, and how to sequence it against your existing decision process.